<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tech 2 Market &#187; pagerank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.galley.net/tag/pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.galley.net</link>
	<description>online marketing + technology:  is it really like cats &#38; dogs?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:10:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google: unranked at the bar?</title>
		<link>http://blog.galley.net/2005/09/22/google-unranked-at-the-bar/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.galley.net/2005/09/22/google-unranked-at-the-bar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jim galley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ramblings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search_engine_optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.galley.net/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pagerank and its relevance since google made its infamous 2003 flordia update is still a hotly debated topic. While that change caused many sites to be dropped from search results, many came back in a few months &#8211; prompting a never ending stream of conspiracy theories and chicken little warnings about an impending change &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pagerank and its relevance since google made its infamous 2003 <a href="http://www.webworkshop.net/florida-update.html">flordia</a> update is still a hotly debated topic.</p>
<p>While that change caused many sites to be dropped from search results, many came back in a few months &#8211; prompting a never ending stream of conspiracy theories and <a href="http://disney.go.com/disneypictures/chickenlittle/index_flash.html?site=1&#038;section=2">chicken little</a> warnings about an impending change &#8211; my site is falling!</p>
<p>But &#8211; I digress.  According to <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/technology/">Google</a> PageRank is more than alive and kicking &#8211; in their own words &#8220;PageRank continues to provide the basis for all of our web search tools&#8221;.  Techies may want to read some whitepapers on the topic &#8211; Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brins <a href="http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/page98pagerank.html">stanford paper</a> is a good place to start.</p>
<p>So understanding Pagerank and monitoring your sites PR ranking is a good idea. How do you find your rank? Best way is from the <a href="http://toolbar.google.com/">google toolbar</a> &#8211; install it in your browser and accept the advanced functions version (different terms for firefox and internet explorer users &#8211; but you get the picture).  Once pagerank is installed, surf to a popular page (<a href="http://netcloak.com">anonymous surfing online</a> perhaps?) and look at the bar.  As I write this, <a href="http://netcloak.com">netcloak.com</a>  has a PageRank of 5 &#8211; which could change as time progresses.  <a href="http://yahoo.com">Yahoo.com</a> has a PageRank of 9 and a lot more traffic than netcloak &#8211; so it ranks higher.</p>
<p>There are other browser toolbars that report pagerank &#8211; <a href="http://www.quirk.biz/searchstatus/">Quirk</a> has a firefox extension that reports PageRank and <a href="http://pages.alexa.com/prod_serv/quicktour.html">Alexa rank</a> &#8211; another site popularity ranking system.  Alexa has come under fire of privacy / spyware advocates &#8211; but it does provide another useful view of the surfing cosmos.  Quirk has a anonymous mode that uses anonymizer.net &#8211; but there is a slight delay in retrieving the ranks and if anonymizer is overtaxed / offline no ranking is reported. Another nit &#8211; the pagerank results in quirk are sometimes different than the pagerank results from the google bar &#8211; in one situation, quirk incorrectly reported a site as unranked (meaning that the site was removed from google)  while google reported otherwise.  So if you&#8217;re trading pagerank stories, make sure that your using the same source &#8211; otherwise, you may be in for a shock [no more chicken little links <img src='http://blog.galley.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ] .  Quirk is at version 1.11 right now, so one can&#8217;t be too critical of the tool just yet &#8211; besides, it provides a lot of other good info in a small amount of screen space.</p>
<p>Does Pagerank matter?  It seems to matter to Google &#8211; perhaps less than before flordia, but important nevertheless.  PageRank may not be the end all metric, but it is one to watch &#8211; and its better to have some information that nothing at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.galley.net/2005/09/22/google-unranked-at-the-bar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

